Are Carbon Accounting Rules for Biomass Energy Fit for Purpose?

Oct 13, 2021

Biomass Carbon Accounting Report
written by Dr Richard Tipper, Executive Chairman, Ecometrica

An accessible yet detailed look at the biomass carbon accounting frameworks and their applications in UK and Europe, recommended for those interested in the sustainable use of bioenergy.

The use of biomass for energy is an important component of forest management. Historically, this has been the case and it is likely to be part of sustainable forest management into the future.

Sustainable bioenergy is one of the alternatives to fossil fuels in the shift towards a zero-carbon economy. Properly managed, biomass can be part of a sustainable, low carbon energy mix and healthy forest landscapes.

However, the development of bioenergy systems at scale has frequently been challenged in terms of its carbon benefits and externalities.

This report offers a comprehensive review of the carbon accounting methods currently in use for bioenergy. It draws on Ecometrica’s extensive track-record to explore evolving best practice in assessing emissions and impacts linked to the production and consumption of wood-based bioenergy and – in particular – biomass from forests, rather than material from agriculture, waste or short-rotation coppices.

International carbon accounting rules, where carbon removals and emissions are accounted for in the land sector, are well established and can be effective. These accounting rules provide a stable and internationally agreed foundation for the carbon accounting of biomass to ensure it delivers climate benefits.

This report aims to improve understanding of the carbon accounting frameworks and sustainability criteria applied to biomass used for energy in the UK and Europe and identify areas for improvement. 

The report concludes that the best way forward would be to build on existing UN and IPCC approved methods for forests and harvested products to ensure bioenergy delivers carbon benefits, rather than reinvent differentiated accounting frameworks for forest biomass.

Some recommendations below include:

  • Monitoring of wood-product markets to ensure the use of bioenergy complements the production of long-lived products, and does not cause the diversion of materials;
  • Development of an improved understanding of the potential carbon impacts of changes to bioenergy policies; 
  • Work by the bioenergy sector with a broad range of stakeholders to develop a common understanding of the role bioenergy plays in forest management and ecosystem protection, not simply decarbonisation of the energy sector;
  • Strengthen policies and standards that encourage forest carbon management with an emphasis on soil carbon conservation;

Development of holistic policies across forestry and forest product sectors to support optimised carbon management, while ensuring the multiple non-carbon benefits of forests, including biodiversity and local communities are not compromised.

Related insights

Helping companies to report scope 3 emissions

Helping companies to report scope 3 emissions

Increasingly, companies are coming to us to measure their scope 3 emissions. Scope 3 emissions are not straightforward to measure, but only when you include them as well as scope 1 and scope 2 in your carbon footprint, do you get a true measure of your carbon impact.